Roux v. Blodgett & Davis Lumber Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting existence of a mutual mistake is a question of fact for the fact finder’s determination
• generally, where “strictly legal rights are in controversy” and the action is governed by the statute of limitations, the doctrine of laches has no application
• if the parties did in fact intentionally agree upon a settlement for unknown injuries, such release will be binding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).