Skip to main content
· 6/18/1970

Roux Laboratories, Inc. v. Clairol Incorporated

Citations

  • 427 F.2d 823
  • 57 C.C.P.A. 1173
  • 166 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 34
  • 1970 CCPA LEXIS 344

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming dismissal of opposition to registration of slogan, 'Hair Color So Natural Only Her Hairdresser Knows For Sure' where court found such phrase to be more than merely descriptive
  • affirming dismissal of opposition to registration of slogan, “Hair Color So Natural Only Her Hairdresser Knows For Sure” where court found such phrase to be more than merely descriptive
  • that a mark is adopted and used with the intent that it indicate source “does not necessarily mean that [it] accomplishes that purpose in reality”
  • that a mark is adopted and used with the intent that it indicate source “does not necessarily mean that [it] accomplishes that purpose in reality”
  • HAIR COLOR SO NATURAL ONLY HER HAIRDRESSER KNOWS FOR SURE held descriptive of hair coloring but secondary meaning established
  • a trademark ease using a standard of “distinctiveness” analogous to “secondary meaning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rich, Almond, Baldwin, Lane, Memanus, Northern, Iowa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.