Skip to main content
· 4/9/2014

Routy Abernathy v. Ray Hobbs

Citations

  • 748 F.3d 813
  • 2014 WL 1378305
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 6482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that reviewing courts must refrain “from engaging in hindsight or second-guessing of trial counsel's strategic decisions”
  • explaining that reviewing courts must refrain “from engaging in hindsight or second-guessing of trial counsel's strategic decisions”
  • explaining that reviewing courts must refrain \from engaging in hindsight or second-guessing of trial counsel’s strategic decisions\
  • reviewing court must refrain “from engaging in hindsight or second- guessing of trial counsel’s strategic decisions.”
  • reviewing court must refrain “from engaging in hindsight or second- guessing of trial counsel’s strategic decisions.”
  • reviewing court must refrain “from engaging in hindsight or second-guessing of trial counsel’s strategic decisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Bye, Melloy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.