· 4/9/2014
Routy Abernathy v. Ray Hobbs
Citations
- 748 F.3d 813
- 2014 WL 1378305
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 6482
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that reviewing courts must refrain “from engaging in hindsight or second-guessing of trial counsel's strategic decisions”
- explaining that reviewing courts must refrain “from engaging in hindsight or second-guessing of trial counsel's strategic decisions”
- explaining that reviewing courts must refrain \from engaging in hindsight or second-guessing of trial counsel’s strategic decisions\
- reviewing court must refrain “from engaging in hindsight or second- guessing of trial counsel’s strategic decisions.”
- reviewing court must refrain “from engaging in hindsight or second- guessing of trial counsel’s strategic decisions.”
- reviewing court must refrain “from engaging in hindsight or second-guessing of trial counsel’s strategic decisions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Bye, Melloy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.