Roussin v. AARP, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taking judicial notice of the regulator’s approval of United’s Medigap rate filings and the precise rates being challenged
• “The Court may . . . take judicial notice of [insurance rate] filings with government agencies that are a matter of public record”
• “to condone such an approach would gut the filed rate doctrine, as any future complainant would allege injuries stemming from only particular portions of a filed rate, rather than the entire rate.”
• “Although the claims are styled as claims of breach of fiduciary duties and gross negligence, Roussin essentially seeks relief for an injury allegedly caused by her payment of her AARP health care premiums.”
• applying doctrine to dismiss antitrust claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).