Rousseau v. McClure

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• citing Bickerstaff v. Vassar College, 196 F.3d 435, 450 (2d Cir. 1999
• “[T]o the extent the intimate associational rights plaintiff asserts arise under the Due Process Clause, and not the First Amendment, as seems to be the case, the appropriate course is to dismiss the intimate association claim as duplicative.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).