Rousse v. Theriot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when both parties testified, but neither testified that verba in praesenti had been exchanged, supplementary evidence provided by wife, including documents signed by the parties which referenced them as husband and wife, could not rehabilitate wife’s claim of common law marriage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).