Rousse v. Home Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that federal district courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over claims fitting the Rooker-Feldman pattern
• explaining that “Brady claims have ranked within the traditional core of habeas corpus”
• finding claims that would not “necessarily spell speedier release” do “not lie at the core of habeas corpus”
• “[lender the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a complaint need not pin plaintiffs claim for relief to a precise legal theory.”
• “[U]nder the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a complaint need not pin plaintiff’s claim for relief to a precise legal theory.”
• “Success in . . . suit for DNA testing would not 7 ‘necessarily imply’ the invalidity of [underlying] conviction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).