Rouse v. New York City Housing Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an alien who acquired permanent resident status by fraud “is deemed, ab initio, never to have obtained [such] status”
• holding that a respondent could not qualify for cancellation of removal based on lawful permanent residence that was fraudulently obtained
• holding that an alien who obtained LPR status through fraud is not lawfully admitted
• holding that an alien who receives lawful permanent resident status by fraud “is deemed, ab initio, never to have obtained [such] status once his original ineligibility . . . is determined in proceedings”
• holding that an alien was ineligible for cancellation of removal for lawful permanent residents because he was “deemed, ab initio, never to have obtained lawful permanent resident status once his original ineligibility therefor [was] determined in [removal] proceedings”
• referring to “individuals who had” obtained their permanent resident status by fraud, or had otherwise not been entitled to it (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).