Skip to main content
· 3/7/2024

Rouse v. Davis

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 915

Syllabus

Where petitioner alleged ambiguities and a typographical error in his sentencing entry, trial court did not err in granting Respondent's motion to dismiss habeas petition under Civ.R. 12(B)(6), as sentencing errors are not jurisdictional and thus are not cognizable grounds for habeas relief Petitioner had an adequate remedy at law in the form of a direct appeal or postconviction review.

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.