Rouse v. Burnham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that requirement \proved difficult to implement\
• “Cases involving settled contract and property rights, for example, require predictability and stability and are generally inappropriate candidates for retroactivity”
• “Cases involving settled contract and property rights, for example, require predictability and stability and are generally inappropriate candidates for retroactivity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).