Texas Supreme Court· 3/9/1955
Rounsaville v. Bullard
Citations
- 276 S.W.2d 791
- 154 Tex. 260
- 1955 Tex. LEXIS 509
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding jury may not reasonably infer ultimate fact from meager circumstantial evidence merely raising any number of inferences, none more probable than another
- holding jury may not reasonably infer ultimate fact from meager circumstantial evidence merely raising any number of inferences, none more probable than another
- “No inference of fact should be drawn from premises which are uncertain. . . . One presumption cannot be based upon another presumption.”
- “The fact relied upon to support the presumption must be proved.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. v. Nortex Oil & Gas Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 1968-11-13· cited 387×
- Citizens National Bank v. Allen Rae Investments Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2004-07-15· cited 166×
- McKnight v. Hill & Hill Exterminators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1985-03-27· cited 91×
- Connell v. ConnellTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1994-10-26· cited 77×
- Texas Sling Company v. EmanuelTexas Supreme Court· 1968-07-24· cited 77×
- Briones v. Levine's Department Store, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1969-07-30· cited 76×
- Bolstad v. EglesonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1959-06-25· cited 60×
- Trevino v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1977-08-31· cited 58×
- ENTEX, a DIV. OF NORAM ENERGY v. GonzalezTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-07-25· cited 48×
- Roberts v. U.S. Home Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1985-05-15· cited 47×
- Polasek v. QuiniusCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1969-03-05· cited 34×
- Caller-Times Publishing Co. v. Triad Communications, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1993-06-07· cited 31×
- Socony Mobil Co., Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1974-12-31· cited 26×
- Martin v. United States Trust Co. of New YorkTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1985-03-05· cited 23×
- Johnston Testers v. RangelCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1968-11-06· cited 23×
- Lewis v. Great Southwest CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1971-10-15· cited 20×
- Ussery v. Ewell Hodges, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1967-06-29· cited 17×
- Imperial Casualty & Indem. Co. of Omaha, Neb. v. TerryCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1970-02-26· cited 16×
- Ice Bros., Inc. v. BannowskyTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1992-10-14· cited 14×
- Pekar v. St. Luke's Episcopal HospitalCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1978-07-27· cited 14×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. PorterTexas Supreme Court· 1889-03-12· cited 82×
- Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. BrannenTexas Commission of Appeals· 1942-11-25· cited 54×
- Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. BrannenTexas Supreme Court· 1942-11-25· cited 51×
- Austin v. NeimanTexas Commission of Appeals· 1929-03-13· cited 31×
- Bullard v. RounsavilleCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1954-10-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.