Roundy's Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that because a non-exclusive easement holder does not hold a possessory interest in the underlying fee, the easement holder cannot enjoin a trespasser from using the property absent a showing that the trespasser's use interferes with the easement holder's use
• stating that the Federal Rules prohibit experts from offering opinions about determinative legal issues
• stating that the Federal Rules prohibit experts from offering opinions about determinative legal issues
• upholding decision not to allow testimony on Wisconsin property law because it amounted to analysis and not expert testimony
• reversing ALJ’s findings on claimant’s subjective testimony, weight granted to treating physician, weight granted to treating non- acceptable medical source, and third-party evidence and remanding for immediate payment of benefits
• explaining how opinions that embrace an ultimate issue are still required to be helpful to the trier of fact and should not merely tell the trier of fact what result to reach (citing Fed. R. Evid. 704, 1972 advisory committee’s note)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).