Skip to main content
· 1/10/1983

Roughton v. Court of Common Pleas, Lucas County

Citations

  • 459 U.S. 1113
  • 103 S. Ct. 746
  • 74 L. Ed. 2d 966
  • 51 U.S.L.W. 3509
  • 1983 U.S. LEXIS 2973

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[E]ven if there is a general prospect of litigation, a document is not protected by work-product immunity if the document was prepared merely in the regular course of business.”
  • as RJR is in the business of litigation, documents prepared in the ordinary course of that business of litigation without a tie to specific litigation are not protected by work product immunity
  • under the joint defense exception, disclosure of privileged information to a third party does not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege if the third party is counsel for an actual or potential co-defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.