Skip to main content
· 6/17/1992

Rough & Ready Lumber Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 26 Cl. Ct. 423
  • 38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,342
  • 1992 U.S. Claims LEXIS 390
  • 1992 WL 135077

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing international abstention and explaining that comity case law considers, among other things, whether the foreign judgment is prejudicial, in the sense of violating American public policy because it is repugnant to fundamental principles of what is decent and just
  • “[A]t this stage of the litigation, the appropriate resolution is a stay rather than a dismissal of the American action.”
  • “In this case, neither party has argued that the Belizean judgments were rendered via fraud or that the Belizean proceedings lacked any element of civilized jurisprudence.”
  • “In this case, neither party has argued that the Belizean judgments were rendered via fraud or that the Belizean proceedings lacked any element of civilized jurisprudence.”
  • describ- ing “whether the judgment was rendered via fraud” as one of several “[g]eneral comity concerns”
  • describ- ing “whether the judgment was rendered via fraud” as one of several “[g]eneral comity concerns”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.