Skip to main content
· 12/11/1987

Rothwell Cotton Company, a Texas Corporation v. Rosenthal & Company, a Partnership, and Fgl Commodity Services, Inc., an Iowa Corporation

Citations

  • 827 F.2d 246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “limited function” of motions for reconsideration is “to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence”
  • stating that Rule 54(b) motions cannot “be employed as a vehicle to introduce new evidence that could have been adduced during the pendency of the ... motion. . . nor serve as the occasion to tender new legal theories for the first time.”
  • stating that a motion to reconsider under Rule 54(b
  • affirming district court’s denial of motion to reconsider under Rule 54(b)
  • affirming district court’s denial of motion to reconsider under Rule 54(b)
  • affirming district court’s denial of motion to reconsider under Rule 54(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Flaum, Reynolds

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.