Rothstein v. Chiavaroli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that corporate entities which, while owned by members of the same family, had separate historical roots, kept separate books and observed adequate corporate formalities, were not alter egos, and a veil that separated them could not be pierced
• “Michigan courts regard proof of the ‘wrong’ to be a separate and distinct showing from the mere proof that failure to pierce the corporate veil would cause the plaintiff to suffer an ‘unjust loss.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).