Rothschild v. Devos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion for relief from judgment without hearing pertinent evidence and allowing for discovery
• finding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion for relief from judgment without hearing pertinent evidence and allowing for discovery
• concluding the appellant’s fraud claim was governed either by the one-year limit in Trial Rule 60(B) or the six-year limit in Indiana Code section 31-15-7-9.1(b), but declining to decide which rule governed because the claim was timely either way
• involving the validity of a property settlement agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).