Skip to main content
· 11/20/2015

ROTHMUND, JEREMY J., PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Nothing in section 314(d) suggests that the Case: 20-148 Document: 17 Page: 5 Filed: 10/30/2020 IN RE: CISCO SYSTEMS INC. 5 prohibition on review applies only to the merits of the Board’s non-institution decisions . . . .”
  • \We have held that the statutory prohibition on appeals from decisions not to institute inter partes review cannot be sidestepped simply by styling the request for review as a petition for mandamus\
  • “We have held that the statutory prohibition on appeals from decisions not to institute inter partes review cannot be side- stepped simply by styling the request for review as a peti- tion for mandamus”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.