Rothfarb v. Bradford Medical Building Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal of § 349 claim where printer packaging advertised that ink cartridges were included but did not specify the size of the included cartridges and therefore was not materially misleading in that respect
• “The elements of [a section 349] action [include an] injury resulting from such [a deceptive consumer-oriented] act.”
• “A [section 350] plaintiff must demonstrate that the advertisement ... resulted in injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).