Skip to main content
· 2/8/2000

Rothermich v. Union Planters National Bank

Citations

  • 10 S.W.3d 610
  • 40 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1110
  • 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 183
  • 2000 WL 141197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that bowling alley pinspotters did not constitute fixtures in a bowling alley, in part, because they were easily replaceable by different pinspotters, and the very pinspotters at issue were then currently being used at a different location
  • noting “[a]n item usable at other locations is not peculiarly adapted for use on the land in question”
  • noting “[a]n item usable at other locations is not peculiarly adapted for use on the land in question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crahan, Russell, Pudlowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.