Rothe v. Maloney Cadillac, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under Magnuson-Moss, a manufacturer’s express written warranty provides a basis to assert the manufacturer’s breach of implied warranties
• holding that under Magnuson-Moss, a manufacturer's express written warranty provides a basis to assert the manufacturer's breach of implied warranties
• characterizing Szajna as holding that privity is not required to bring an action for breach of implied warranty where there is a written warranty under the Act
• addressing manufacturer’s implied warranties and noting section 2308(a) of the Act “prohibits a ‘supplier’ (defined *** as including parties with whom a consumer does not necessarily deal directly
• characterizing Szajna as holding that privity is not required to bring an action for breach of implied warranty where there is a written warranty under the Act
• addressing manufacturer’s implied warranties and noting section 2308(a) of the Act “prohibits a ‘supplier’ (defined *** as including parties with whom a consumer does not necessarily deal directly) who makes an express warranty from disclaiming any implied warranty to a consumer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).