Roth v. Continental Wire Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Missouri has adopted Pomeroy’s rule and holding that the trial court did not err in excluding evidence that plaintiff was assigned the cause of action for collection only
• noting that Missouri has adopted Pomeroy's rule and holding that the trial court did not err in excluding evidence that plaintiff was assigned the cause of action for collection only

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2008-06-23· cited 726×
• Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company, a Corporation v. Norris Grain Company, a Tennessee Corporation, and Norris Grain Company, an Illinois Corporation
  Eighth Circuit· 1965-03-15· cited 17×
• Hubbard v. Lock Joint Pipe Co.
  E.D. Missouri· 1947-02-21· cited 5×
• Baltimore MacHine & Equipment, Inc. v. Holtite Manufacturing Co.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-12-20· cited 5×
• Buxton v. Debrecht
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1902-07-22· cited 3×
• Fullerton Lumber Co. v. Massard
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1910-05-16· cited 2×
• Dixon v. Dixon
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1904-10-18· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lingenfelder v. Wainwright Brewing Co.
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1890-10-15· cited 51×
• Gould v. Stein
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1889-09-04· cited 32×
• Caruth-Byrnes Hardware Co. v. Wolter
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1886-10-15· cited 26×
• Wentzville Tobacco Co. v. Walker
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1894-07-09· cited 24×
• Vogt v. Butler
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1891-04-15· cited 17×
• Schoenberg v. Loker
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1901-04-09· cited 7×
• Smith v. Paris
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1879-10-15· cited 6×
• Maguire v. McCaffrey
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1857-03-15· cited 1×