Skip to main content
· 2/28/1941

Roth v. Chatz

Citations

  • 118 F.2d 156
  • 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3957

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding court did not abuse its discretion by denying request to amend complaint to assert new claim in response to summary judgment motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sparks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.