Rotenberg v. Industrial Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• claimant’s subjective statements of discomfort insufficient to establish “unsatisfactory or hazardous” working conditions within meaning of § 8—73—108(4)(c)
• the claimant’s “own subjective statements of 4 discomfort” are insufficient to establish unsatisfactory working conditions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ward v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1995-09-14· cited 8×
• Rodco Systems, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1999-06-10· cited 7×
• Wafford v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1995-10-26· cited 5×
• Chris Crazy Trader, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2003-11-20· cited 2×
• Doke v. Employment Division
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-06-05

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rathburn v. Industrial Commission
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1977-06-16· cited 164×
• Thompson v. Industrial Commission
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1974-03-12· cited 7×
• Medina v. Industrial Commission
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1976-09-16· cited 7×