Rot v. Targee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing that gross receipts from hedging activities created a substantial distortion in apportionment when 8 to 30 percent of all gross receipts came from a hedging technique that netted at most 2 percent of income

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).