Rostad & Rostad Corp. v. Investment Management & Research, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “notwithstanding” phrase is not independently dispositive where the second statute incorporates “other applicable” laws
• holding that the phrase \notwithstanding ... any other law\ did not settle the express repeal question, when other laws were incorporated by reference
• “notwithstanding” phrase by itself did not in and of itself indicate a congressional intent to repeal other statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).