Rost v. Mayor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that plaintiff “cannot now amend [its] complaint merely by raising new facts or theories in [its] briefs”
• holding insufficient as a matter of law motive allegations that company “was caught in a death spiral” and “was both hemorrhaging current investor money and was also not attracting sufficient new money”
• excluding, for example, statements that an appraised value was “materially greater” than the correct value
• rejecting argument that valuation expert should be excluded for lack of industry expertise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).