Rossy Salazar v. Jose Maimon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \the prevailing petitioner is presumptively entitled to necessary costs\
• emphasizing respondent's \statutory obligation to come forward with evidence\ to establish that a fee award was clearly inappropriate
• affirming an award of $39,079.13 for attorney’s fees and expenses after district court reduced award by half from $75,149.91
• emphasizing respondent’s “statutory obligation to come forward with evidence” to establish that a fee award was clearly inappropriate
• noting the district court awarded $39,079.13 in an ICARA case that settled without trial
• noting “[o]nce [a] district court order[s] [a] child returned to [the petitioner], section 11607(b)(3) shift[s] the burden of proof onto [the respondent] to establish that an award of the requested necessary expenses would be ‘clearly inappropriate’” (quoting § 9007(b)(3))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).