Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court holding that the indemnitee’s policy “was merely excess” and stating that “the trial court was correct in finding that” the in-demnitor’s policy “must be viewed as primary insurance;” emphasis added
• “to apportion the loss in this case pursuant to the other insurance clauses would effectively negate the indemnity agreement . . . .”
• “[Where] the parties have expressly contracted with respect to the duty to indemnify, the extent of the duty must be determined from the contract and not by reliance on the independent doctrine of equitable indemnity.”
• “Where … the parties have expressly contracted with respect to the duty to indemnify, the extent of that duty must be determined from the contract and not by reliance on the independent doctrine of equitable indemnity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).