Rossiter v. Rossiter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• record owner of property was necessary and indispensable party to action affecting her interest in property, and family court had no jurisdiction to adjudicate questions affecting title to property where record owner not named as party
• husband's acts that were \equally referable to his marital duties and to the use and possession of the premises as the marital dwelling\ did not refer unequivocally to an alleged antenuptial agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).