ROSSI

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that New York courts follow the majority view and do not view spoliation of evidence as an actionable tort
• stating that \the majority of jurisdictions refuse to recognize such a cause of action\ (citations omitted) and that \[t]he Courts of New York follow the majority view and do not recognize spoliation of evidence as a cognizable tort action\
• allowing amendment of complaint to substitute spoliation claims with causes of action for common law negligence and prima facie tort
• New York does not recognize spoliation of evidence as independent tort, but does recognize common-law action for negligently or intentionally impairing right to bring action against tortfeasor
• New York does not recognize spoliation of evidence as independent tort, but does recognize common-law action for negligently or intentionally impairing right to bring action against tortfeasor
• unlawful interference with employee’s right to pursue workers’ compensation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).