Rosser v. Bradford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion for reconsideration of final judgment entered under Rule 54(b) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) respecting Count Seven
• to be entitled to reconsideration, a party must do more than reassert arguments that “were previously made and were carefully considered by the court”
• “[T]he movant . . . must do more than merely reassert[ ] arguments which were previously made and were carefully considered by the court.”
• discussing the two-part, burden-shifting procedural scheme for addressing summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).