Rossello v. K-Mart Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In an application for review of an award on the ground of a change in condition, the burden is on the party alleging such change to prove his allegations by a preponderance of the evidence.” (quoting Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. Reeves, 1 Va. App. 435, 438 (1986))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clinch Valley Medical Center v. Hayes
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-12-19· cited 22×
• Henrico County School Board v. Etter
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2001-09-25· cited 21×
• SP TERRY COMPANY, INC. v. Rubinos
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-08-13· cited 14×
• Clinch Valley Med. Ctr v. Johnnie S Hayes
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-12-19
• LKQ Corporation and CCMSI v. Joseph Galarreta Morales
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2023-08-01

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. Reeves
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-02-04· cited 229×
• Celanese Fibers Co. v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1985-03-08· cited 97×
• Suite v. Clinchfield Coal Co.
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-09-12· cited 9×
• Suite v. Clinchfield Coal Co.
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-02-27· cited 5×
• Stump Trucking v. Stump
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-05-21· cited 3×