Rossco Holdings Inc. v. State of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the “essential underpinning” of a claim is “the invalidity of the administrative action,” a plaintiffs failure to seek a writ of administrative mandate “renders the administrative action immune from collateral attack”
• holding property owner could not assert an inverse condemnation claim in order to attack a permit condition if the owner has not obtained a reversal of the condition without first petitioning for statutory administrative writ of mandamus through the required procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).