Skip to main content
· 1/20/1994

Ross v. Thompson (In Re Levine)

Citations

  • 162 B.R. 858
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 1382
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 848
  • 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 59
  • 1994 WL 28698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting appellee’s argument that docketed minute sheet was final appealable order
  • where minute entry order, signed by the judge, directed counsel to lodge a form of order consistent with the ruling, the subsequently entered lodged order was the final, appealable order
  • court's \under advisement ruling\ was not a final 3 appealable order because it did not evidence the judge's 4 intention that the order was the court's final act, as counsel 5 was directed in that order to lodge an order consistent with the 6 under advisement ruling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Ashland and Jones, Bankruptcy Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.