Ross v. State Univ. of N.Y.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• internal quotation marks 2 USCA4 Appeal: 24-4072 Doc: 23 Filed: 07/30/2024 Pg: 3 of 3 omitted
• “Lozano’s contention that the delay cost him the opportunity to serve a concurrent sentence . . . is unavailing, as the record doesn’t show a credible possibility that he would have received a concurrent sentence . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).