Ross v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence defendant “deliberately wore short shorts that were substantially sure to lead to the exposure of his penis” sufficient to establish guilt despite argument with witness who told him to “tuck it in”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Ware v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-23· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kaklamanos
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-04-03· cited 258×
• Wonyetye v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-28· cited 7×
• W.R.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-22· cited 7×
• Burks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-18· cited 2×