Ross v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioner’s motion under Rule 60(b) was an improper substitute for an appeal where he “essentially asked the district court to reverse itself and rule in [his] favor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Thomas
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2008-09-18· cited 342×
• Mitchell James Bias v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2015-11-20· cited 24×
• Schultz v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2013-12-30· cited 7×
• John Doe I and Jane Doe I v. John Doe
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2025-03-27· cited 5×
• Daniel Lee Eby v. State of Idaho
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2009-05-15
• Post-conviction
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2013-12-30
• John Doe I and Jane Doe I v. John Doe
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2024-12-20

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lowe v. Lym
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1982-06-15· cited 38×
• State v. Goodrich
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1983-03-10· cited 32×
• Puphal v. Puphal
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1983-06-30· cited 27×
• First Bank & Trust v. Parker Bros., Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1986-12-17· cited 20×
• State v. Ross
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1996-09-26· cited 16×
• Hamilton v. Rybar
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1986-06-06· cited 15×
• First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A. v. Stauffer
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1986-12-29· cited 12×
• Hoopes v. Bagley
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1990-06-06· cited 3×