Supreme Court of Georgia· 3/2/1977
Ross v. State
Citations
- 233 S.E.2d 381
- 238 Ga. 445
- 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1056
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a declaratory action is “not maintainable by persons already convicted of crimes who wish to examine or reexamine aspects of the conviction or sentence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gunter, Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gilreath v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1981-06-30· cited 155×
- Ingram v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1984-11-27· cited 151×
- Willie X. Ross v. Ralph KempEleventh Circuit· 1985-03-25· cited 34×
- GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. Atlanta Botanical Garden, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia· 2016-05-09· cited 27×
- Ross v. HopperSupreme Court of Georgia· 1977-11-29· cited 16×
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1977-05-13· cited 9×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1977-04-07· cited 3×
- Lucious L. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-07-19
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pulliam v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1976-02-24· cited 156×
- Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1974-11-18· cited 74×
- Lucion v. McDowell County Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1994-07-20· cited 18×
- Pendleton v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia· 1976-03-11· cited 12×
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company v. United Family Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia· 1975-01-08· cited 9×
- Tierce v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1970-01-16· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.