Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1/22/1990
Ross v. State
Citations
- 390 S.E.2d 429
- 194 Ga. App. 285
- 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 87
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- we will not disturb a trial court’s decision to , limit voir dire absent an abuse of discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deen, Pope, Benham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Castillo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-05-19· cited 62×
- Southern Railway Co. v. LawsonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1987-03-12· cited 52×
- Chastain v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1986-05-09· cited 28×
- Hamm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-04-18· cited 3×
- Shoffeitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1962-09-18· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.