Ross v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• 30-day period allowed for filing a motion for a new trial began to run on “nunc pro tunc” date, rather than on date on which the clerk of court filed the order
• dismissing Ross’ first appeal as untimely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rocha v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-09-07· cited 52×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-09-11· cited 9×
• Ross v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-01-15· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rowland v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1995-01-24· cited 927×
• Veasley v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2000-10-02· cited 52×
• Andrew L. Parks, Inc. v. Suntrust Bank, West Georgia, N.A.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-01-19· cited 25×
• Peters v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-04-12· cited 21×
• In the Interest of H. L. W.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-06-14· cited 17×
• Bowen v. Clayton County Hospital Authority
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-01-05· cited 11×