Ross v. Salminen

Citations

• 191 F. 504
• 112 C.C.A. 148
• 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4959

Syllabus

<p>1. Evidence (§ 222*) — Admissions—Oral Statements of a Parts’ Admissible, Though Facts Not Within I-Iis Personal Knowledge.</p> <p>Where defendant, charged with liability for an injury to plaintiff, caused by’ his automobile, stated to plaintiff’s representative that the car was his, and was being operated at the time in his behalf, such statement was admissible in evidence against him, whether or not he spoke of his own knowledge of the facts.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Evidence. Cent. Dig. §§ 7G8-808; Dec. Dig. § 222.*]</p> <p>2. Evidence (§ 205*) — Pro os of Conversation Through Interpreter.</p> <p>The testimouy of a witness to a conversation held with another through an interpreter is admissible, without the evidence of the interpreter.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Evidence, Cent. Dig. § 700; Dec. Dig. § 205.*]</p>