Skip to main content

Citations

  • 308 N.J. Super. 132
  • 705 A.2d 784
  • 1998 N.J. Super. LEXIS 36

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that due to ERISA preemption, \New Jersey's concepts of equity cannot be applied and a QDRO cannot be entered after the fact\
  • noting that “[n]o federal case has allowed a QDRO to be entered after a participant’s death”
  • rejecting arguments that benefits vest in either the beneficiary's ex-wife or current wife and dividing benefits on other grounds
  • surviving spouse who participated fully in family court proceedings disputing ex-spouse’s claim to retirement benefits was bound by family court’s judgment notwithstanding the fact that she was not formally a party to the action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.