New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1/30/1998
Ross v. Ross
Citations
- 308 N.J. Super. 132
- 705 A.2d 784
- 1998 N.J. Super. LEXIS 36
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that due to ERISA preemption, \New Jersey's concepts of equity cannot be applied and a QDRO cannot be entered after the fact\
- noting that “[n]o federal case has allowed a QDRO to be entered after a participant’s death”
- rejecting arguments that benefits vest in either the beneficiary's ex-wife or current wife and dividing benefits on other grounds
- surviving spouse who participated fully in family court proceedings disputing ex-spouse’s claim to retirement benefits was bound by family court’s judgment notwithstanding the fact that she was not formally a party to the action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Raynor v. RaynorNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-03-29· cited 50×
- Louise Robichaud Samaroo v. Winston R. Samaroo, At&t Management Pension Plan v. Louise M. Robichaud, Louise M. Robichaud.Third Circuit· 1999-09-24· cited 45×
- Johnson v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-04-09· cited 38×
- Torres v. TorresHawaii Supreme Court· 2003-01-06· cited 22×
- Toll Bros. v. Tp. of West WindsorNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-08-16· cited 19×
- Preston v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-05-02· cited 13×
- Davenport v. Robert H. Davenport, D.D.S., M.S., P.A.M.D. North Carolina· 2001-04-20· cited 7×
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. TimboD. New Jersey· 1999-09-30· cited 7×
- Gardner v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-11-28· cited 7×
- Orlowski v. OrlowskiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2019-05-07· cited 7×
- In Re Estate of GardnerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-11-28· cited 6×
- Katz v. Mondelblatt (In Re Mondelblatt)E.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-09-12· cited 4×
- Stahl v. Exxon Corp.S.D. Texas· 2002-07-01· cited 3×
- Smith v. Estate of SmithD. New Jersey· 2003-02-19· cited 3×
- New Jersey Builders Ass'n v. New Jersey Meadowlands CommissionNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2007-05-21· cited 2×
- Cerame v. Township CommitteeNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-04-03· cited 1×
- JOANNA B. ORLOWSKI VS. ROBERT ORLOWSKI (FM-02-1778-14, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2019-05-07
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commissioner v. LesterSupreme Court· 1961-05-22· cited 348×
- Brennan v. OrbanSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1996-07-16· cited 81×
- Arthur C. Hawkins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Glenda R. Hawkins v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueTenth Circuit· 1996-06-14· cited 50×
- United States v. Rmi Company Nl Industries, Inc. v. Hon. Daniel J. Snyder, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of PennsylvaniaThird Circuit· 1979-05-02· cited 49×
- Francis v. United Technologies Corp.N.D. California· 1978-09-19· cited 39×
- State of Alaska v. AndrusD. Alaska· 1977-04-11· cited 13×
- Seavey v. LongNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-07-15· cited 10×
- Biddle v. BiddleNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1979-02-06· cited 7×
- Weiss v. Federal Reserve BankSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 7×
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. FowlerE.D. Michigan· 1996-04-15· cited 5×
- Miko v. MikoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-08-17· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.