Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 12/8/1976
Ross v. Ross
Citations
- 358 N.E.2d 437
- 371 Mass. 439
- 1976 Mass. LEXIS 1191
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the language of section 3(a) “is general and applies to any purposeful acts by an individual, whether personal, private or commercial”
- noting that the language of section 3(a) “is general and applies to any purposeful acts by an individual, whether personal, private or commercial”
- “‘[Transacting any business in this commonwealth’” applies to noncommercial activity and includes acts which relate to marriage
- permitting husband to maintain action for specific enforcement of separation agreement to offset earlier modification order of probate judge
- execution by defendant of separation agreement in New York, which obligated him to pay extraordinary medical expenses of child, was a transaction of business within that State
- ‘The statute’s reference to ‘transacting any business’ is general and applies to any purposeful acts by an individual, whether personal, private, or commercial”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hennessey, Reardon, Braucher, Kaplan, Wilkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Droukas v. Divers Training Academy, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-05-04· cited 172×
- William A. Hahn v. Vermont Law SchoolFirst Circuit· 1983-01-21· cited 160×
- Bond Leather Co., Inc. v. Q.T. Shoe Mfg. Co., Inc. And Martin S. Nadler, Bond Leather Co., Inc. v. Q.T. Shoe Mfg. Co., Inc., Melvin Nadler, Inc.First Circuit· 1985-06-18· cited 140×
- The Ealing Corporation v. Harrods LimitedFirst Circuit· 1986-05-16· cited 119×
- Nova Biomedical Corporation v. Willi Moller, D/b/a/ Gebruder Moller GlasblasereiFirst Circuit· 1980-08-08· cited 88×
- Mary Marino and Thomas Marino v. Hyatt CorporationFirst Circuit· 1986-06-16· cited 85×
- Carlson Corp. v. University of VermontMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-03-06· cited 78×
- Johnson v. WitkowskiMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1991-06-19· cited 61×
- Nile v. NileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-08-29· cited 50×
- Morrill v. TongMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-09-13· cited 44×
- T.F. v. B.L.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-08-25· cited 43×
- Haddad v. TaylorMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1992-03-30· cited 42×
- Burtner v. BurnhamMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1982-02-05· cited 34×
- Haas v. BretonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-03-23· cited 31×
- Stephen L. Gray v. Michael T. O'Brien and the Sugarloaf Mountain CorporationFirst Circuit· 1985-12-03· cited 25×
- Lillie Benally and Grant Benally on Behalf of Norman Benally, an Adult v. Amon Carter Museum of Western ArtTenth Circuit· 1988-10-03· cited 24×
- Binder v. BinderMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1979-06-15· cited 21×
- Buckeye Associates, Ltd. v. Fila Sports, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1985-09-04· cited 20×
- Kennedy v. KennedyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1980-06-27· cited 20×
- Whistler Corp. v. Solar Electronics, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1988-04-25· cited 19×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court· 1958-10-13· cited 7,025×
- \Automatic\ Sprinkler Corp. of America v. Seneca Foods Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1972-03-16· cited 151×
- David Neifeld v. Meyer Steinberg. David Neifeld v. Meyer SteinbergThird Circuit· 1971-02-19· cited 101×
- Blank v. BitkerSeventh Circuit· 1943-06-10· cited 66×
- Leeper v. LeeperSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1974-04-30· cited 54×
- Wood v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-02-03· cited 23×
- Strasser v. SchlesingerNew York Supreme Court· 1967-03-03· cited 9×
- Webb v. United StatesE.D. Pennsylvania· 1957-06-19· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.