Skip to main content

Ross v. Ross

Citations

  • 358 N.E.2d 437
  • 371 Mass. 439
  • 1976 Mass. LEXIS 1191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the language of section 3(a) “is general and applies to any purposeful acts by an individual, whether personal, private or commercial”
  • noting that the language of section 3(a) “is general and applies to any purposeful acts by an individual, whether personal, private or commercial”
  • “‘[Transacting any business in this commonwealth’” applies to noncommercial activity and includes acts which relate to marriage
  • permitting husband to maintain action for specific enforcement of separation agreement to offset earlier modification order of probate judge
  • execution by defendant of separation agreement in New York, which obligated him to pay extraordinary medical expenses of child, was a transaction of business within that State
  • ‘The statute’s reference to ‘transacting any business’ is general and applies to any purposeful acts by an individual, whether personal, private, or commercial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Reardon, Braucher, Kaplan, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.