Ross v. Modern Mirror & Glass Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the one-year limit was a statute of limitations that applied to overpayment of benefits
• stating that this Court must enforce the plain meaning of the statute as written
• stating that this Court must enforce the plain meaning of the statute as written
• “Statutes that relate to the same subject must be read together as one, even if they contain no reference to one another.”
• “Statutes that relate to the same subject must be read together as one, even if they contain no reference to one another.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).