Ross v. Maryland State Police Licensing Division

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• state law governs prejudgment interest upon confirming arbitration award, but federal law governs post-judgment interest
• “Under [28 U.S.C.] § 1961, post-judgment interest is mandatory and cannot be withheld by a district court or set by the court at a rate different from the rate specified by the statute.”
• “Under [28 U.S.C.] § 1961, post-judgment interest is mandatory and cannot be withheld by a district court or set by the court at a rate different from the rate specified by the statute.”
• “Under [28 U.S.C.] § 1961, post-judgment interest is mandatory and cannot be withheld by a district court or set by the court at a rate different from the rate specified by the statute.”
• “Under [28 U.S.C.] § 1961, post-judgment interest is mandatory and cannot be withheld by a district court or set by the court at a rate different from the rate specified by the statute.”
• “Under [28 U.S.C.] § 1961, post- judgment interest is mandatory and cannot be withheld by a district court or set by the court at a rate different from the rate specified by the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).