· 11/28/2006
Ross v. Kish
Citations
- 51 Cal. Rptr. 3d 484
- 145 Cal. App. 4th 188
- 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10901
- 2006 Daily Journal DAR 15544
- 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1867
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “because the evidence suggests [the attorney-defendant] knew the claims for breach of contract and legal malpractice lacked factual and legal support[,] ... a trier of fact reasonably could infer [the defendant-attorney] filed the action with malice”
- holding that “because the evidence suggests [the attorney-defendant] knew the claims for breach of contract and legal malpractice lacked factual and legal support[,] . . . a trier of fact reasonably could infer [the defendant-attorney] filed the action with malice”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.