Skip to main content
· 3/10/1961

Ross v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania

Citations

  • 128 So. 2d 230
  • 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1958

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reiterating that if a statute is ambiguous that “the interpretation that best furthers the legislative purposes underlying the [] statutory scheme must prevail”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ayres, Bol, Hardy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.