Ross v. Hartman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ordinance requiring that individuals lock their motor vehicles promotes public safety because unlocked motor vehicles “create[] much more risk that meddling by children, thieves, or others will result in injuries to the public.”
• violation of ordinance requiring motor vehicles to be locked was negligence per se in action by party injured by the stolen vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).