Skip to main content
· 4/16/1964

Ross v. Harding

Citations

  • 391 P.2d 526
  • 64 Wash. 2d 231
  • 1964 Wash. LEXIS 321

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining “condition precedent” as “a fact which must exist or occur before a duty of immediate performance of a promise could arise”
  • conditions prece dent include facts and events which must exist or occur before there is a breach of contractual duty
  • \breach by a 8 No. 73427-0-1/9 plaintiff of a material condition precedent relieves a defendant of liability under a contract\
  • Whether a provision in a contract is a condition, the nonfulfillment of which excuses performance, depends upon the intent of the parties, to be ascertained from a fair and reasonable construction of the language used in the light of all the surrounding circumstances.
  • “‘Conditions precedent’ are those facts and events, occurring subsequently to the making of a valid contract, that must exist or occur before there is a right to immediate performance, before there is a breach of contract duty, before the usual judicial remedies are available.”
  • “It would be difficult to choose words to more precisely express an intention to create a condition precedent than those used in the contract here to be construed. ‘It is specifically understood and agreed that this offer is made subject to the written consent * * * ’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.